https://nanyte.com/photoresists/kmpr-1050 · last updated 2026-07-12
- Manufacturer
- Kayaku Microchem (MicroChem)
- Tone
- negative
- Chemistry
- Epoxy (SU-8 type)
- Thickness
- 34–115 µm
- Developer
- 2.38% TMAH (0.26N) aqueous alkaline developer (primary); SU-8 Developer (solvent-based) is also usable as an alternative
- Applications
- High aspect ratio · MEMS structural · Electroplating / molding · Etch mask
Cross-checked — two independent extractions agree.
Spin coating
KMPR 1050 is spin-coated to 34–115 µm. The curve below is redrawn from the manufacturer's published data — read your target thickness off the vertical axis and take the matching spin speed as a starting point.
Data points
| Series | rpm | µm |
|---|---|---|
| KMPR 1050 | 1000 | 101 |
| 2000 | 68 | |
| 3000 | 51 | |
| 4000 | 44 | |
| KMPR 1050 (23°C Japan & Asia) | 1000 | 115 |
| 2000 | 67 | |
| 3000 | 47 | |
| 4000 | 34 |
Values are the manufacturer's starting points, not a guarantee; verify on your own tool. Characterize on-tool. Series digitized from a published figure were independently cross-checked by a second blind read; treat those values as approximate (±10 %).
KMPR 1050: read from figure 1 "Spin speed vs. Thickness for KMPR 1000 resists (21°C US & EU)", p.2 of the Kayaku Microchem/MicroChem "KMPR 1000 Chemically Amplified Negative Photoresist" datasheet (Ver. 4.2, UPenn nanoSOP mirror). Chart plots four curves (KMPR 1050/filled square, 1025/filled diamond, 1010/filled circle, 1005/open square), each with 4 markers at 1000/2000/3000/4000 rpm. The KMPR 1050 curve was identified as the filled-square series and the topmost (thickest-film) curve at every rpm, consistent with its legend position (listed first) and Table 1's viscosity ordering (1050 = 13,000 cSt, the highest of the four, so it should coat thickest at a given speed). Read at high resolution (4x page render, cropped) so the four data-point markers were individually resolvable; still an eyeball figure read, not a numeric table.
KMPR 1050 (23°C Japan & Asia): read from figure 2 "Spin speed vs. Thickness for KMPR® 1000 resists (23°C Japan & Asia)", p.2 of the Kayaku Microchem/MicroChem "KMPR 1000 Chemically Amplified Negative Photoresist" datasheet (Ver. 4.2, UPenn nanoSOP mirror). Chart plots four curves (KMPR 1050/filled square, 1025/filled diamond, 1010/filled circle, 1005/open square), each with 4 markers at 1000/2000/3000/4000 rpm. The KMPR 1050 curve was identified as the filled-square series and the topmost (thickest-film) curve at every rpm, consistent with its legend position (listed first) and Table 1's viscosity ordering (1050 = 13,000 cSt, the highest of the four). Points were read by extracting the marker vector-path pixel rectangles and the axis tick-label pixel positions directly from the PDF page content stream (not a manual on-screen eyeball estimate), then converting via the resulting pixel-to-value linear scale (0-120 µm y-axis span; 1000 rpm x-axis grid spacing); cross-checked against the rendered chart image (kmpr-1050-p2-hires.png). digitized 2026-07-12
Recommended program: dispense 1 ml of resist per inch (25 mm) of substrate diameter; spin at 500 rpm for 5-10 s at 100 rpm/s acceleration, then spin at the target speed for 30 s at 300 rpm/s acceleration. The document publishes TWO spin curves for the same four resists at two different ambient conditions: Figure 1 (21°C, US & EU) and Figure 2 (23°C, Japan & Asia) — the curves are not identical (e.g. KMPR 1050 at 1000 rpm reads ~101 µm in Figure 1 vs. ~115 µm in Figure 2), a reminder that spin results are sensitive to coat-bowl ambient temperature/humidity and should be recharacterized on-tool. Both curves are now captured above: Figure 1 (21°C US & EU) as the primary curve, Figure 2 (23°C Japan & Asia) as a second series digitized by extracting marker vector-path pixel positions and axis tick-label pixel positions directly from the PDF page content stream. Source: "Coat" / "Recommended Program", p.1, and Figures 1-2, p.2.
- Adhesion
Soft bake
- Soft bake
- 100 °C · hotplate
- Notes
SOURCE: Table 2 "Soft Bake Times" and "Soft Bake" section text, p.2
Exposure dose
The manufacturer does not publish a clearing dose for KMPR 1050. Determine it with a dose array on your own tool.
- As published
- Post-exposure bake
- 100 °C
Not published for this resist: Dose at 365 nm, Dose at 405 nm — characterize on-tool.
Development
- Developer
- 2.38% TMAH (0.26N) aqueous alkaline developer (primary); SU-8 Developer (solvent-based) is also usable as an alternative
- Dilution
- 2.38% TMAH (0.26N), used at this standard concentration (not diluted from a stock in the document)
- Time
- Not published — characterize on-tool
- Method
- immersion
- Rinse
- Developer family
- TMAH-based
SOURCE: "Develop" and "Rinse and Dry" sections plus Table 5 (TMAH) and Table 6 (SU-8 developer), p.3
Hard bake, etch & strip
- Etch resistance
- Stripper
- Storage
Not published for this resist: Hard bake, Descum — characterize on-tool.
SOURCE: "Plating" section note, p.3
Where it's used
KMPR 1050 is the thickest-coating grade in Kayaku Microchem/MicroChem's KMPR 1000 line and, unlike the solvent-developed SU-8 2000 family, is a chemically amplified epoxy resist designed to develop in aqueous TMAH — a meaningful process difference worth flagging for anyone assuming all thick epoxy negative resists behave like SU-8. Its published process tables (soft bake, exposure dose, TMAH develop time) only cover film thicknesses up to 80 µm, while KMPR 1050's own spin curve reaches roughly 101 µm at 1000 rpm; process engineers working at the thick end of this grade's range will need to extrapolate or characterize on-tool, since the datasheet simply does not publish numbers there. PEB time follows a thickness-threshold rule (2/3/4 minutes at 25/50 µm cutoffs) rather than a continuous table. A distinctive storage gotcha: KMPR 1000 resists must be stored frozen (14°F/-10°C) and require a full 24-hour room-temperature thaw before use — treating it like a room-temperature-stable resist will produce inconsistent films. The resist strips cleanly with Remover PG when only lightly cross-linked, but a fully electroformed/plated structure needs the stronger Remover PG → XP Remover K → XP Neutralizer K sequence to fully dissolve.
Sources & disclaimer
- Kayaku Microchem (MicroChem) — KMPR 1050 datasheet (Ver. 4.2 (printed in the footer of every page: "Ver. 4.2")) · accessed 2026-07-10
- Lee et al.. Fabrication of thick electroforming micro mould using a KMPR negative tone photoresist. Journal of Micromechanics and Microengineering (2008). doi:10.1088/0960-1317/18/5/055032180 µm, 18:1 KMPR molds — strippable, unlike SU-8.
- Shin et al.. UV Lithography and Molding Fabrication of Ultrathick Micrometallic Structures Using a KMPR Photoresist. Journal of Microelectromechanical Systems (2010). doi:10.1109/JMEMS.2010.2045880KMPR molds for mm-wave traveling-wave-tube structures.
Manufacturer datasheet values are starting points; optimal parameters depend on your substrate, equipment and environment. Product names and trademarks belong to their respective owners. NANYTE is not affiliated with the manufacturers listed. Last updated 2026-07-12.
